13 Bombs

2023 [INDONESIAN]

Action / Crime / Thriller

12
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 50% · 6 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 70%
IMDb Rating 6.5/10 10 1970 2K

police bomb espionage fight spy based on true story

Director

Angga Dwimas Sasongko Photo
Angga Dwimas Sasongko

Top cast

Chicco Kurniawan Photo
Chicco Kurniawan as Oscar
Rukman Rosadi Photo
Rukman Rosadi as Damaskus
Lutesha Photo
Lutesha as Agnes
Niken Anjani Photo
Niken Anjani as Gita
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB 2160p.WEB.x265
1.29 GB
1280*536
Indonesian 2.0
NR
Subtitles id  us  
24 fps
2 hr 24 min
Seeds 13
2.66 GB
1920*804
Indonesian 5.1
NR
Subtitles id  us  
24 fps
2 hr 24 min
Seeds 17
6.43 GB
3840*2160
Indonesian 5.1
NR
Subtitles id  us  
24 fps
2 hr 24 min
Seeds 2

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by febriyanwahyupurwanto 7 / 10

Decent Indonesian action film

I'm a fan of a good, detailed and compelling action movie, this one has hit the mark for me.1. Indonesian action films has been improved SO MUCH in the last few years, i know it all started from The Raid, which was technically still directed by a western director, but now this movie is directed by a local and the production, set pieces, and environment looks alive, detailed and functional, the props are realistic, the guns looks great (noticed some flashy new SIG MCX Virtuses there)2. The VFX are nice, much better than previous indo films, so i'm quite impressed with the quality, it doesnt look out of place and is well blended with the environment, noticed some practical effects as well3. I like the new bitcoin aspect and the two startup founders, it makes the dynamic more unique and add additional tension to the usual Good Cop and Bad Cop shenanigans.Though i have to say several drawbacks:1. The sound, the dialogues are nicely mixed with the ambience and music, however the gun sounds leave much to be desired, it lacked the environmental interaction usually heard with gunshots, like indoor and outdoor should sound different, it lacked the tail and echo while indoor, and some of the fighting sounds are not that good2. Firearms technique, i noticed how Arok reloaded his AR, he tapped the bolt catch and there's a sound of bolt releasing, but i saw the bolt didnt move, rather, it stayed closed the whole time instead of releasing.3. The camerawork during fighting looks a bit too close, the way we can't see all the details from the fight.
Reviewed by vzudjoef 6 / 10

High Expectations, High Disappointment

Reviewed by JvH48 6 / 10

Under the hood an average action movie, adding crypto currency, terrorism and whizz kids in an attempt to attract audience relating to such contemporary elements

Saw this at the Rotterdam film festival (IFFR) 2024. After the screening I scored 4 out of 5 for the audience award. In hindsight, should have been 3 because of the generous running time of nearly two and a half hours, unnecessary to get the story lines across and overly stressing our patience.Other minus points are (a) over-reliance on crypto currency as a novel plot element, a frivolous attempt to attract new audience, plus (b) introducing whizz kids who seem to be able to do the impossible whatever device or system is put in front of them. As an ex-IT-er, I consider the latter next to impossible, especially in the finale where cables from network switches and routers are pulled in a particular order, to prevent a virus from spreading, for the layman (m/f) possibly spectacular but very unrealistic.Peeling this off, we get a standard action movie under the hood: ample car chases, heavy weaponry, explosives, many innocent bystanders and even some less innocent victims. Bringing in crypto currency and terrorism do not save the story from being traditional. Yet, some new elements make this movie stand out:1. Firstly, the cause the terrorist group is fighting for, is defendable and just. A pity that their means are despicable. Their back stories are sad but not sufficient to justify all the bloodshed. In hindsight, their benevolent motives are foreshadowed by the fact (later on we understand them better) that the armored car that is attacked in one of the first scenes, is left open for anyone passing by to pick from. A nice "Robin Hood" touch.2. Secondly, the two whizz kids who are pulled in, add extra plot material and act as a third group besides the anti-terrorist agency and the terrorists. Does it make the plot convoluted enough to fill nearly 150 minutes running time?? The traditional distinction between good and bad guys is not as clear cut as usual, which is not a complaint but rather a positive element.3. Thirdly, the effectiveness of the chain of command in the agency leaves much to desire. Even worse, it works counter productively in the long run. Relieving someone of duty due to a defendable mistake, may seem to demonstrate a firm grip on the operation, but it is a waste of human potential and can only create disgruntled employees who eventually may work against the agency's mission.All in all, the action parts make it watchable for people "in" for this kind of movie, while others (like me) can only endure the explosions, the gun fire, the car chases, the bloodshed, and so on. Still, this movie has some other nice parts that make it better than the average shootout.
Read more IMDb reviews

5 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment