Chromeskull: Laid to Rest 2

2011

Action / Horror

14
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 33% · 3 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 33% · 250 ratings
IMDb Rating 5.0/10 10 4490 4.5K

snuff gore serial killer slasher torture killing spree

Plot summary

After his gruesome encounter with a girl, and being outmatched by his own assistant, ChromeSkull resurges with a horrifying massacre of his own.

Director

Robert Hall Photo
Robert Hall

Top cast

Mimi Michaels Photo
Mimi Michaels as Jess
Brianne Davis Photo
Brianne Davis as Mrs. Cromeans
Julia Lea Wolov Photo
Julia Lea Wolov as Female FBI Agent
Nick Principe Photo
Nick Principe as ChromeSkull
720p.BluRay 1080p.BluRay
855.84 MB
1280*714
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 33 min
Seeds 1
1.72 GB
1920*1072
English 5.1
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 33 min
Seeds 6

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by Mike_T-Little_Mtn_Sound_Archive 6 / 10

Not as good as the first but an OKAY sequel with less umph

Short and sweet, with no spoilers.As noted in other reviews, the movie picks up where part one ended, but quickly goes another direction, as we find out Chromeskull has an entire team of people working for him. Again, as many reviews note, this is hard to believe, and a bit of a personal letdown, but I won't trash it like others. At the end of the day, I don't judge movies on whether they are realistic, as I take what I'm fed and go from there. Most serial killer/slasher flicks are unrealistic, so why wrestle with a plot over its "this could never happen" facets?I put this movie in the "JUST O.K." boat. I came for the blood and gore, not superb storyline or acting, and in this respect it was fine. Due to working on intercharacter relationships, however, some of the intensity was lost, as well as the consistency of "kills," if that makes sense.***NOTE: So I like blood and guts horror. Sue me.But I digress.Personally, I feel like the storyline tried to do too much for a formulaic slasher flick. I liked the original, as it wasn't about notable actors or personal relationships other than the people involved. With Brian Austin Green's inclusion, part 2 felt a bit contrived, as if attempting to find validation for the script. Besides the fact that he doesn't play a convincing maniacal killer, the beauty of part 1 is that the story doesn't rely on anything but sheer slashing. BAG was completely unnecessary and could have been played by any old chump and it wouldn't have mattered to me. Though, any time I see Danielle Harris, I'm happy.Anyway...beyond this bit of beef, it was ok. The pace is different, since we already know what Chromeface does, and the story takes precedent over kills. At the end of the day, there just wasn't enough "meat" to take it from "just ok" to "good."The production was on par with part 1. Shot on professional equipment, decent acting (but for BAG), editing, etc...all about the same as the original. Special fx remained decent as well.All in all, if you watched the first one and enjoyed it, you'll be ok with the sequel (I hear there's another one in development...with BAG. Ugh), just don't expect quite as much. Not a total let down, but I think the writer just tried to do too much.Notes on Parental Contact: There is a fair amount of profanity. At least as much as part 1, if not more.I would not call this a scary movie, but there are several scenes that could be described as "intense."Brief partial nudity but sex and sexual content is not a prevailing theme.Violence and gore is what most people would call "severe." As noted above, there are fewer killings in part 2 but the ones we do see are no less gory than the first. If you're a gorehound like me, it's fine. Lots of blood & violence with a smattering of gore for good measure.For those who call this a terrible movie because the story is fake or the acting isn't Oscar worthy, why would you expect this to begin with? It's a straight-up slasher flick for the modern horror buff. Yes...they tried to add some "Saw"-like elements, but come on...what movie doesn't borrow from another these days.So, if you watched the first, then you should see the second. Just know it's lost a bit of umph. Still worth the watch, just take what you're fed and go with it.
Reviewed by trashgang 5 / 10

again gory and a lack of story

The specialized magazines loved this flick. I must say that I wasn't a fan of the first one. I liked the gore but it lacked on a story. This one was directed by the same director as part 1 (Robert Hall) and I must say, it was shot in the same way, a lot of gore but again it was written by the director himself and yes, a lack of story...The flick starts were the other one ended at the grocery store. The heroin from part 1 (the wife of Robert Hall, Bobbi Sue Luther) has survived the atrocity at the store and she finally can go away from it all, wrong, after a shower someone is visiting her motel. From there on you can pick up the flick easily because before the shower scene she do has a flashback about what happened at the store. The names from part 1 are back here in this part and some new names like Danielle Harris. She's only in it for a few minutes so don't expect to see her act like in Blood Night: The Legend Of Bloody Mary. Her name is in fact just a teaser. The acting is believable so on that part no complaints.But as I said, the story is weak. Here we do have a fake Chromeskull and of course the real one. The fake one do plays the main part in the first part of Laid To Rest 2. The second part it's gore galore with the real Chromeskull. But it just doesn't fit the way the story is told. Why those two girls are chosen by Chromeskull isn't explained of example. And the coppers doesn't add anything special too.But of course this feature is known for it's gore and that is done in a excellent way. The red stuff do flows a lot and the killings are done in a exaggerated style. The knifes are again impressive. Overall, this movie is really one for the gorehounds and the lovers of torture porn. The Laid To Rest flicks aren't my cup of tea storywise but i do love the gore in it and the way the killings are done.Gore 4/5 Nudity 2/5 Story 2/5 Effects 4/5 Comedy 0/5
Reviewed by atinder 5 / 10

Not as good as first movie

I enjoyed the first, I didn't think, I would like, I really did but can't say the same about this sequelThis movie started of where last movie left off, which I liked and then movie went down hill as the movies goes on.I just didn't like where they took the story at all, as I didn't like the plot, it was hard to enjoy it, however the kills in this movie are really creative some really good gory death scenes.The acting in this movie was hit and miss from some of the cast members Not as good or as fun as the first movie but decent kills makes this good slasher movie. 5 out of 10
Read more IMDb reviews

3 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment