Dear John

1964 [SWEDISH]

Action / Drama / Romance

4
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 71% · 3 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 71%
IMDb Rating 6.4/10 10 438 438

Plot summary

Divorced skipper John meets Anita, a single mother, at a port and spends the weekend with her.

Director

Lars-Magnus Lindgren Photo
Lars-Magnus Lindgren

Top cast

Emy Storm Photo
Emy Storm as Karin Lindgren
Håkan Serner Photo
Håkan Serner as Erwin
Hans Wigren Photo
Hans Wigren as Elon
Stig Woxther Photo
Stig Woxther as Taxi Driver
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
1018.66 MB
1280*766
Swedish 2.0
NR
Subtitles sv   cz   dk   de   gr   us   es   fi   fr   hr   hu   it   no   nl   pl   pt   ro   ru  
24 fps
1 hr 50 min
Seeds ...
1.85 GB
1792*1072
Swedish 2.0
NR
Subtitles sv   cz   dk   de   gr   us   es   fi   fr   hr   hu   it   no   nl   pl   pt   ro   ru  
24 fps
1 hr 50 min
Seeds 2

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by lor_

Romantic classic; not gimmicky enough for today's fans

After all these years (I remember the hub-bub when this was released in '66) I was thrilled to finally see DEAR JOHN, a great Swedish film which proved to be the "date movie" of its day here in America. And I also discovered why it has fallen into obscurity.Writer-director Lars-Magnus Lindgren, a very talented & versatile filmmaker, brought impressive technique to telling a simple tale, of a wanderlust sailor and a single-parent waitress who fall in love. Nowadays there would have to be a hook, some fantastic or deus ex machina gimmickry to keep the audience's attention, as in the string of dreadful Nicholas Sparks soggy-romance adaptations, including coincidentally a new film called DEAR JOHN.But Lindgren wisely keeps it simple, natural, believable and moving, his only trick being a very complicated time structure of flashbacks and flashbacks within flashbacks. There's method in this approach, as the film's final two twists take on a depth thanks to the careful foreshadowing (playing off and around the film's title implication of a farewell note).Casting is in no small measure the secret of Lindgren's success here. Jarl Kulle is the 30-something hero, quite different from his archly played Bergman roles of the period like THE DEVIL'S EYE and ALL THESE WOMEN. Because they're Bergman works, though among his least favored, I used to see them all the time, but DEAR JOHN remained elusive all these years.Kulle's sailor has a Billy Budd hairstyle which immediately gives Kulle the necessary youthful appearance. He seems self-centered and "one of the guys" for the early part of the film, leading the audience to believe he's only out for a sexual conquest to tell all his pals about. This adds wonderful panache when the tables seem to be turned in later reels, all leading to an even-handed and satisfying romantic conclusion.As the leading lady we don't have a blonde bombshell but instead the very ordinary (but lovely) Christina Schollin, who reminded me strongly of America's Mary Stuart Masterson (they even have the same toothy smile). Like Schollin, Masterson was cast in many leading roles for about a decade starting in the mid-'80s but never broke out of the pack to achieve stardom. Even her BENNY & JOON opposite Johnny Depp didn't cement her in the pantheon.With Schollin, the breaks were there, the performances too, but she's still too little known. Her Arne Mattsson film WOMAN OF DARKNESS is brilliant, and of course it doesn't get any better than Bergman's FANNY AND Alexander. Back in DEAR JOHN she is touching, so natural one never feels you're watching a star turn. The script's frank treatment of sex (there are many jokes later on about Kulle's "John Thomas", not the sort of thing you'd see or hear about in a Hollywood movie of the time) is its initial drawing card, with extremely tasteful nude scenes.So flash-forward to the 21st Century and it is precisely the hokey films that fans (and grubby video distributors) have revived. Sex movies like Joe Sarno's INGA or a slew of Mac Ahlberg soft (and hard) porn titles are in circulation, but not DEAR JOHN.Helena Nilsson is wonderful, again completely natural, as Schollin's cute child, and Kulle's impromptu spiriting them away to Copenhagen to see the zoo is a beautifully directed set-piece. And Rune Ericson's black & white visuals are evocative -I've always loved his work for Mai Zetterling and this movie explains why she made him her go-to d.p.Now I'll have to hunt for even more obscure Schollin/Kulle pairings from the early '60s: Lindgren's LOVE MATES and Swedish WEDDING NIGHT; unsung quality cinema.
Reviewed by martinpersson97 9 / 10

Great Oscar nominee

This incredible and stellar Swedish drama, by one of the land's better directors, is definitely deserving of all the praise and awards it has gotten - including the Oscar for Best Foreign Language film.The writing is very sharp, and in line with the director's provice and capabilities as a filmmaker. The stellar script is accompined by the actors, who all do an incredible job, some of the best in their impressive careers for sure. Very much a standout in everyone's filmography.The cinematography, cutting and editing is great, and feels very authentic of the director's style, and of the swedish film overall.Truly an incredible romantic drama that is definitely recommended for any lover of film, and one of the better Swedish pictures!
Read more IMDb reviews

No comments yet

Be the first to leave a comment