Die'ced (2023) YIFY - Download Movie TORRENT

Reviewed by paul_m_haakonsen 4 / 10

Generic and forgettable slasher...

While I had indeed never even heard about this 2023 horror movie titled "Die'ced", as I stumbled upon it by sheer chance here in 2025, I must admit that the movie's cover was interesting enough to make me stop and take notice. Given my love of all things horror, of course I needed no persuasion to sit down and watch what writer and director Jeremy Rudd had to offer.Writer Jeremy Rudd put together a pretty straightforward script and storyline. Now, for a life-long horror veteran, then "Die'ced" was a mere walk through the park. However, I do believe that newcomers to the horror genre will find the movie way more entertaining, enjoyable and scary than I did. Hold on, because I am not saying that "Die'ced" was a bad movie, not at all, it just was a generic foray into the slasher genre, and I personally found the narrative a bit too bland and generic.The killer in the movie was nothing outstanding; it was, in fact, a rather non-distinct killer, and a forgettable one. Just another thing that proved to be too generic and bland in the movie.There were a couple of familiar faces on the cast list, with the likes of Eden Campbell and Jason Brooks. The acting performances in the movie were fair.For a slasher movie, then the movie didn't really have any outstanding or memorable kill scenes. And let's just be honest, isn't that one of the prime reasons for why people are watching slasher movies, to have some memorable and gory kill scenes to talk about?A watchable slasher horror, for sure, but hardly a noteworthy venture into the genre. This is not a movie that will make a second play on my screen.My rating of writer and director Jeremy Rudd's 2023 movie "Die'ced" lands on a generous four out of ten stars.

Reviewed by lhurzele 3 / 10

It was not good, but I Kinda Liked it

People have said this was basically a cheap Terrified knock off. I get that comparison but I also don't think the Terrifier was so original as to completely avoid movies coming out after it from getting that treatment. The storyline is fine, albeit flawed, hilariously at times (i.e., the killer was accidentally released from the psych ward newscaster of a clerical error). The writing was pretty awful and the acting was the dane. The lead actress was actually decent, especially compared to everyone else. The technical aspects were pretty awful; scene transitions were often clunky, the shots seemed to change aspect ratio randomly but not by way of lense changing so much as bad DV editing resulting in people appearing smashed. Very weird. The most intolerable part though was the sound editing and rubbish. It just didn't make sense and was mixed poorly so it airways drew your attention away from the action. All that said, I found some enjoyment in this, especially for being so low budget. Same character and general "universe" but with the above issues addressed I would even say it's passable.

Reviewed by jcrouse-04177 4 / 10

Missing Elements

So this movie was sub par, but I'd prefer to provide more of a critique than trash it, because I feel like certain elements could have elevated this film quite a bit. It wasn't all bad, but I'm going to start with what could have been improved.For starters, I completely agree with those who mentioned the blatant copying of Terrifier. There is paying homage and taking influence, and then there's outright replicating the source material and this film falls into the latter category at times.The acting was mediocre to bad, but I saw potential for a better performance in a few of the actors. I don't think any would ever become Hollywood A-Listers, but I felt like the director could have coached better performances from a few of them, allowing for a better end product.The score felt genetic and uninspired. I doubt the budget allowed for an original score to be composed, but better music choices for certain scenes and automating the volume to rise and fall during key moments could have made a huge difference.The cinematography wasn't all bad, but there were times where I felt like a scene was missing a cutaway shot or could have benefited from a different angle or different lighting. Overall, it only took me out of the moment a handful of times.Now, the area I felt would have the greatest impact on the overall product. Sound design. A better sound design would have elevated this film tremendously. Even though it may not be realistic, Hollywood has trained us for decades on what a stab should sound like in a film. There were stabs that made no sound at all. The ones that did make sounds were dull and ineffective. There was a scene where a wood pallet was knocked over but it sounded more like a broom stick hit the floor. There was an incredible kill where a guys head was ripped in half, but it felt lacking because the squishing of blood and cracking of bone and everything you would expect to hear was either too quiet or not present at all. I just felt like a proper focus on sound design would have gone a long way with this film.Now, on to what I liked about it. The Scarecrow was a cool idea for a slasher. I liked the look and the idea. There were creative kills that had great practical effects. Although an hour is a short run time for a feature, I'm glad they didn't pad it with a bunch of filler just to extend it. They told the story they wanted and didn't force it to fit an hour and a half time (or more) block.Overall, I've seen much worse and understand the limitations of time and budget, but sometimes where you allocate that time and budget can make a huge impact on the final product.

Die'ced

2023

Horror

Die'ced

2023

Horror

Plot summary

Director

Top cast

Tech specs

Movie Reviews

Generic and forgettable slasher...

It was not good, but I Kinda Liked it

Missing Elements

1 Comments