Emmanuelle

2024

Drama / Romance

30
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 18% · 39 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 18%
IMDb Rating 4.1/10 10 2991 3K

based on novel or book bangkok, thailand remake female protagonist hong kong softcore

Director

Audrey Diwan Photo
Audrey Diwan

Top cast

Jamie Campbell Bower Photo
Jamie Campbell Bower as Sir John
Naomi Watts Photo
Naomi Watts as Margot Parson
Will Sharpe Photo
Will Sharpe as Kei Shinohara
Anthony Chau-Sang Wong Photo
Anthony Chau-Sang Wong as The Eye
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU 720p.WEB 1080p.WEB 1080p.WEB.x265 2160p.WEB.x265
1003.38 MB
1280*534
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  fr  nl  es  de  
24 fps
1 hr 49 min
Seeds 5
2.01 GB
1920*800
English 5.1
NR
Subtitles us  fr  nl  es  de  
24 fps
1 hr 49 min
Seeds 12
963.09 MB
1280*534
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  fr  nl  es  de  
23.976 fps
1 hr 44 min
Seeds 12
1.93 GB
1920*800
English 5.1
NR
Subtitles us  fr  nl  es  de  
23.976 fps
1 hr 44 min
Seeds 17
1.75 GB
1920*800
English 5.1
NR
Subtitles us  fr  nl  es  de  
23.976 fps
1 hr 44 min
Seeds 19
4.7 GB
3836*1604
English 5.1
NR
Subtitles us  fr  nl  es  de  
24 fps
1 hr 44 min
Seeds 12

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by chloe-dumas 3 / 10

Beautiful and empty

Aesthetically gorgeous. Apart from that, the script is almost laughable, and dialogs even more. No action, no word is believable, hence disconnected from the audience. I'm not quite sure what has been done to the sound, was every line redone post-production? It ends up being very flat and takes away the spice you would expect from such a great actress as Noemie Merlant. On this note, the entire cast is impressive for giving their very best to an empty shell.A dozen people left the room during the movie, first one after 10 minutes. I myself fought to stay, out of respect for the cast and crew (Naomi Watts is such a good actress) and for Cinema itself. I hardly managed. The end brings nothing. I left running, quite concerned that a 2024 version of a famously erotic name had been stamped on a movie that reflects in no way the evolution of feminism, and women's pleasure, since 1974.
Reviewed by scott-1157 5 / 10

Intriguing remake of the classic story, but a very different kind of movie.

This is a decidedly darker take in style and substance than the original. The cinematography is darker; where the original was mostly outdoors in the lush yellow sunshine of Bangkok, this version is all shadows and dark interiors. The characters are darker, too, more silent and secretive.Noémie Merlant, while lovely, is sharper and more angular than Sylvia Kristel, and lacking in Kristel's pure, innocent beauty. She tends to play the part much less open and expressive, adding to the mystery.The secondary and peripheral characters are mostly undeveloped. Naomi Watts is totally wasted in a very minor role, and no one else seems up to the task of becoming an important part of the story. This version also lacks the other beautiful bodies that populated the original. The nudity, such as it is, is far less copious and quite a bit less explicit, making the sexuality of the character almost a sidelight of her personality, rather than an important feature of the story.For my taste, there's a whole lot more to like in the original, from Sylvia Kristel's stunning beauty, to the lush tropical scenery, to the beautiful bodies filling so many of the scenes. If you aren't going to make it better, why bother to remake it?
Reviewed by c3dman 4 / 10

Style over substance

The good: beautiful locations, often great cinematography and the film mostly has a great atmosphere (reminded me a bit of Lost in Translation). For its style alone, I'd give it a 7/10The rest however is pretty bad. No character depth or development, pointless and often involuntarily funny dialogue, which makes the scenes that are supposed to be erotic quite dull And also: hardly any storyIf you're looking for a stylishly made movie with no substance that gives you a good laugh from time to time because of its ridiculous dialogue and logic, then you'll at least be entertained.But from a holistic point of view, I can't give it more than 4/10.
Read more IMDb reviews

8 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment