Girl with a Gun

2022

Action

3
IMDb Rating 3.2/10 10 215 215

Plot summary

Follows a woman who after her parents are killed learns about a troubling family history that pushes the boundaries of what a person will go to avenge those they love.

Director

Kevin M. White Photo
Kevin M. White

Top cast

Rachel G. Whittle Photo
Rachel G. Whittle as Penelope Toupe
Jeremy London Photo
Jeremy London as Cody
Bobby Freedman Photo
Bobby Freedman as Guy In Gun Stall
Ronni Hawk Photo
Ronni Hawk as Tomi Shaw
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
777.2 MB
1280*542
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 24 min
Seeds 1
1.56 GB
1920*812
English 5.1
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 24 min
Seeds 1

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by fluffchop 2 / 10

The most boring "action" film of all time.

There's so little action it shouldn't be catagorised as an action it should be under drama. In which case it works as a drama but as an action film it's pathetic.It's got some really boring and disjointed editing too.I didn't enjoy the film.I give it a 2/10 and that's generous.There's so little action it shouldn't be catagorised as an action it should be under drama. In which case it works as a drama but as an action film it's pathetic.It's got some really boring and disjointed editing too.I didn't enjoy the film.I give it a 2/10 and that's generous.Best avoided as it's the most boring action film of all time.
Reviewed by A_Different_Drummer 3 / 10

stunning achievement ... in bad film making

I believe that under proposed Diversity/Equity rules, I am obligated to award at least one point for actually getting this film into production. Because, as we all know, effort counts. And, to be fair, the cinematography is stunning. You can take any of the outdoor shots at random, and turn them into a screensaver, effortlessly. Wow. That said, writer/director Kevin White has produced a film that is so wrong on so many levels, it can be immediately studied in any film class anywhere as an example of what not to do. The dialog was intended to be pithy (nothing wrong with pithy) but instead comes across as if there are entire scenes missing. There is nothing wrong with using "unknown" actors -- as long as they can actually act, and sell their roles. None of that here. Every movie needs something called the "glue", something that holds your attention while the story is being developed. None of that here either. As I have explained in other reviews, one of the giveaways of an ultra-low-budget indie is a sound track so intrusive that it actually tries to compensate for everything else that is missing. Check. If effort counts, viewers who make it to the end of the reel should get points also. ((Designated "IMDb Top Reviewer." Please check out my list "167+ Nearly-Perfect Movies (with the occasional Anime or TV miniseries) you can/should see again and again (1932 to the present))
Reviewed by julian-640-544058 1 / 10

Were they actually serious with this mess?

To call this an amateur student film would be an insult to amateur student films. The story could have been written by a six-year-old (and probably was). The acting (if you could call it that) reminded me of a kid's high school play... a bad one. I looked and looked for some redeeming quality to justify my spending time on this but, alas, I could not find one. There are endless continuity mistakes, editing errors where everywhere (looked like cut and paste...done poorly), the music was as weak, misplaced and ridiculous and the dialog was painfully crude.If this was not intended to be some kind of joke, like a parody on making a movie, then it failed there as well. And if the writer/director was seriously trying to make a movie, then he and all who participated, should be properly embarrassed.My advice to all who were part of this thing: Don't quit your day job...you are going to need it.
Read more IMDb reviews

1 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment