Honest Man: The Life of R. Budd Dwyer

2010

Action / Biography / Documentary / Drama / News

2
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Certified Fresh 61% · 1 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 61%
IMDb Rating 7.2/10 10 665 665

Director

James Dirschberger Photo
James Dirschberger

Top cast

Neil O'Neill Photo
Neil O'Neill as William Smith
R. Budd Dwyer Photo
R. Budd Dwyer as Self
Dyan Dwyer Photo
Dyan Dwyer as Self
Joanne Dwyer Photo
Joanne Dwyer as Self
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
690.43 MB
1280*714
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
29.97 fps
1 hr 15 min
Seeds ...
1.25 GB
1920*1072
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
29.97 fps
1 hr 15 min
Seeds ...

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by ShoeBuckle 6 / 10

A terribly one-sided "documentary".

I just finished the film and was taken by how one sided it turned out to be. At least half of the film covers his past. It plays out more like a tribute to the main character - Budd Dwyer.The film is composed entirely of interviews and news casts. Headlines and partially highlighted newspaper articles are repeatedly shown. The selection of people interviewed and the amount of air time they are given all create bias towards Dwyer.One example is the the appointment of a federal prosecutor. The film has someone interviewed stating that the "Democratic governor" had a role in his appointment. That is far from being true as it was a federal crime. The president at the time was Ronald Reagan who was also head of the Republican party. The Attorney General of the US is appointed by the president and he in turn assigns federal prosecutors. The "documentary" tries to make it seem that the Democratic governor who felt wronged by Dwyer was out for vengeance.Another example of biasness is when the film shows the man who gave Dwyer the bribe money. William Smith, the district Republican chief, states in one scene of the film he was surprised that Dwyer accepted the money when he offered it to him. This would seem to indicate he knew it was bribe money. The film then tries to show he lied at Dwyer's trial because he was offered a plea bargain. One scene lasts three seconds and the other 4 minutes. Be very careful while watching as you may miss items as they are being glossed over by the filmmakers. Afterwards think about all you have seen and make your own decision regarding the case.The interviews with Dwyer's son unwittingly show how he failed as a father. His son is not a very nice or compassionate man. The film spends far too much time interviewing Bud Dwyer's friends and family. It does not spend enough time combing through the case which led to his conviction.The "documentary" did not do a very good job when explaining the charges against Dwyer. Instead it quickly introduced the evidence and witnesses then spent more time trying to demean them. It's as if the filmmakers felt only the headlines and a few quips were sufficient. I took issue with this and realized how poorly done the film had become.I enjoy watching documentaries and exploring issues in an unbiased manner. This film really was a let down. I would say it is more of a propaganda piece than anything else. If you always felt Bud Dwyer was innocent or were one of his supporters then this film may be enjoyable. No one can feel good about what Dwyer did in taking his own life but do not let that act cloud your own judgment when viewing the film. I can not recommend others view it.
Reviewed by

Reviewed by brian-wernham-396-865622 7 / 10

A very poignant story especially the last half hour

A very poignant story especially the last half hour. His wife son daughter and friends have obviously been involved in the making of this documentary...

Read more IMDb reviews

4 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment