Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge

2023

Action / Adventure / Comedy / Fantasy / Horror / Sci-Fi / Thriller

4
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 36% · 1 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 36%
IMDb Rating 2.0/10 10 294 294

Plot summary

A reporter, cameraman, and some petty thieves are stranded in a boat out on the ocean. The only thing that stands between them and their lives is a 50-foot prehistoric megalodon shark. They must all pull together to survive.

Director

Mark Polonia Photo
Mark Polonia

Top cast

Titus Himmelberger Photo
Titus Himmelberger as Lennings
Jeff Kirkendall Photo
Jeff Kirkendall as Klaus
Mark Polonia Photo
Mark Polonia as Stan
James Carolus Photo
James Carolus as Oil rig worker
1080p.WEB
1.05 GB
1920*1080
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
N/A
Seeds 4

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by godierightnow 2 / 10

What am I watching

Jurassic shark 3 jumps the shark with confirmation of the greatest shared universe of all time. Forget the MCU, mark polonias universe is the most entertaining movie universe ever. Jokes aside this movies inclusion of the shark from sharkenstein is a terrible choice. Do not add other terrible movies into the already awful Jurassic shark franchise. And it's not just sharkenstein they are adding into their universe, it's land shark too. Remember how in land shark the shark could go on land? That's probably why that movie sucks. Anyway in this abomination sharkenstein can walk on land, it did that in sharkenstein but it needed a lightning boost. That's probably why that movie sucks too. Also the mad scientist from sharkenstein died in that movie. I guess he's just alive now because we need exposition for a shark that we don't need in this movie but is only here to add runtime. So as you can see this movie sucks and I've only talked about one scene. There are a lot more issues but most of them are the usual mark polonia issues like a terrible plot, cheesy dialogue, bad acting, ugly CGI, cheap puppets, awful music and those same actors from Jurassic shark 2. Despite all these issues it is better than Jurassic sharks 1&2 and other Mark Polonia movies.
Reviewed by bobbird-84946 1 / 10

Wow

We put this on trying to find a easy watch for the weekend. I have never seen such a pile of crap in my life. The CGI is like something from the 80s. We're only 5 minutes in and praying for the actors careers. The SFX people are going to hell.Something actually worse than the Kardashians.The fire on the boat scene is brilliant, who would release this crap with any self respect?10 minutes in and praying for the actors who will never act again & struggle to work in burger king. Describing a cheap PC usb camera as a "small underwater camera" is a bit naff.On a positive note... the film ends.Anybody involved in this film.... please stop.
Reviewed by paul_haakonsen 1 / 10

This was abysmal...

Well, I have to be honest and start out by saying that I harbored absolutely no expectations to this 2023 movie titled "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge", as I have indeed watched the previous two movies. Yet, I still opted to watch it, on account of it being a shark movie that I hadn't already seen.Now, the storyline in "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge", as written by Bando Glutz, was actually pretty straightforward and not all-together too shabby. Sure, it was generic, predictable and somewhat dumb, but it could have been worse.But it is hard to point out all the flaws that there is to "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge", because there were so many flaws in the movie. So many, in fact, that it keeps the movie afloat, because everything is so over-the-top hilariously bad to witness.The acting performances in "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" were wooden and rigid at best. I have to say that the performance put on by Jamie Morgan, in the role of Boyd, was some of the worst acting performances I have witnessed in a long, long time. But it seemed to be a consensus in the movie that the acting performances had to be amateurish, wooden and forced.The special effects in "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" were bad, so very, very bad. The CGI animated shark was just awful to look at. And the practical effect shark was nothing more than a hand-puppet shark and blatantly so, as it looked nowhere near a realistic shark in any way.The best thing about "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" was actually the movie's cover/poster.It should be noted that "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" also does a crossover, as it brings in the shark from the 2016 "Sharkenstein" movie into the storyline.If you enjoy low budget B movies with questionable effects and amateurish acting performances, then by all means "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" from director Mark Polonia might be your type of movie.My rating of "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" lands on a one out of ten stars.
Read more IMDb reviews

2 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment