Matthew Bourne's Romeo and Juliet (2019) YIFY - Download Movie TORRENT

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by adamjohns-42575

"Now, is the Winter of our discontent!"

Matthew Bourne's Romeo And Juliet (2019) -As much as I enjoyed Matthew Bourne's take on 'The Nutcracker' (2003ish) I immediately found this interpretation of Shakespeare's most well known story very hard to get in to, for it's different setting and for the lack of clarity as to who was playing whom and what their connections were. And as 'The Nutcracker' used a similar institutional set it didn't really show any originality in Matthew's interpretation.As with a previous version* of this story, also told to Prokofiev's music, I found the dances too modern and too odd to get along with. Neither the movement nor the music seemed to be telling any story and it was unclear where the Bard's romantic tragedy fit within it all.The actor playing Tybalt (Dan Wright) was nice to look at, but I couldn't understand why his character appeared to be forcing his cousin Juliet (Cordelia Braithwaite) to have sex with him? It might have worked better if the warden character had been the Prince of Verona from the original story instead, in the same way that Baz Luhrmann had turned him in to a police Captain with his version. Tybalt could then have been one of the other inmates along with the rest of the characters.It was all very frantic and I'm sorry to say that Prokofiev's music didn't help. Maybe Mr Bourne just wasn't using it properly, but I certainly couldn't follow what was supposed to be going on based on any well timed crescendos or lulls in the melody.When Romeo (Paris Fitzpatrick) appeared on stage and started jerking all around in a very strange dance style, akin to that of Fat Boy Slim's 'Praise You' video, I just thought that it was too weird to stick with and I had to knock it on the head. Life's too short to watch bad theatre.Unscored as unfinished*Romeo And Juliet: Beyond Words (2019)

Reviewed by Rodrigo_Amaro 8 / 10

A creative, different and imaginative view of a classic

Shakespeare's classic play "Romeo and Juliet" got an alternative and imaginative adaptation in the hands of Matthew Bourne. Instead of the poetic words of the famous playwright, we got zero dialogues as a ballet company performs elaborated dances and routines to the sound of Prokofiev's composition "Romeo and Juliet" , using of their bodies and movements to express the romance and the tragedy from the play, conveying a great deal of emotions and sensations. The setting of Verona is now a mental hospital where ill-fated lovers Romeo (Paris Fitzpatrick) and Juliet (Cordelia Braithwaite) are committed along with other male and female patients. There's plenty of love in the air for the love birds and the patients too (which includes a loving and cute gay couple), but they're closely observed by Tybalt (Dan Wright), an aggressive bulked chief of security who keeps preventing their romantic encounters, and leading to an escalated tragedy.An engrossing and positive experience, unique and filled with imagination that blends many art forms into one with an impecable result. The music, the great choreographies, the use of space and the lighting were all very effective, but probably the more versed ballet enthusiasts won't find the spectacle all that groundbreaking or so fascinating as I did. Besides the expression through dance, what captivated me the most was the acting from the ensemble, most notably Paris (Romeo). Love, tenderness, fury and despair, the young man delivered all and his chemistry with Cordelia was very charming and believable as a truly romantic couple trying to fight the odds and the dramatic circumstances around them; and there's nice bits of humor coming from the patients and the couple's rich parents delivering lots of money to the hospital representatives.It's an interesting different view of a classic and it has everything to please its audiences. It's thrilling, sexy, funny, but also dramatic and poetic. 8/10.

Reviewed by cynsm-16647 2 / 10

A Bewildering Ballet: A Review of Matthew Bourne's Romeo and Juliet

I saw this in early 2024 at the Ahmanson Theatre in Los Angeles. Upon hearing the title "Romeo and Juliet," one's mind instantly conjures images of Shakespeare's tragic lovers, the feuding Montagues and Capulets, and the timeless tale of love that dares to cross the lines of familial discord. Therefore, it was with a sense of eager anticipation that I attended Matthew Bourne's adaptation, expecting a modern twist on the classic. Unfortunately, my anticipation quickly turned to perplexity.Firstly, for those uninitiated like myself, it's crucial to note that this production strays far from the traditional theatrical experience. Bourne's "Romeo and Juliet" is an entirely wordless endeavor, communicated solely through the medium of interpretive dance. While the power of dance to convey narrative and emotion is undeniable, this production faced significant challenges in doing so clearly and compellingly.The storyline, a cornerstone of any "Romeo and Juliet" adaptation, was nebulous at best. Without the familiar dialogue and soliloquies, the narrative attempted to unfold through choreography and expression. However, the abstract nature of interpretive dance combined with a plot that deviates from the expected rivalry between two families to a more ambiguous conflict made it challenging to connect with the characters and their plight.Moreover, the side characters, who ideally should complement and enhance the story of the central lovers, often diverted attention with their actions, further muddying the narrative waters. Rather than elucidating the storyline, their movements felt disjointed, making it difficult to discern their relevance or the dynamics at play.Compounding the issue was the setting. Abandoning the iconic Verona backdrop, Bourne opts for a nondescript dystopian universe. This choice, while bold, further distances the production from its namesake, leaving the audience adrift in an unrecognizable setting without a clear narrative anchor.The absence of spoken word or traditional singing was another layer of unexpected challenge. Music and dance are undoubtedly powerful storytelling tools, yet the exclusive reliance on these elements demanded a level of interpretive engagement from the audience that, for some, may prove too demanding. This is not to discount the talent of the dancers, whose skill and commitment to their art were evident. Yet, the choreography's ability to tell this particular story in a coherent and engaging manner was, in my view, lacking.To its credit, the production's design elements-from costumes to set design-were visually striking, offering a contemporary aesthetic that might appeal to those seeking an avant-garde theater experience. And yet, the beauty of these elements could not fully compensate for the production's narrative shortcomings.In conclusion, Matthew Bourne's "Romeo and Juliet" is a production that dares to reimagine a classic in a highly unconventional manner. While innovation in the arts should always be encouraged, this rendition may not resonate with traditionalists or those seeking a clear narrative thread. It's a performance that, while visually and stylistically bold, may leave audiences divided in their ability to connect with its core story.As always, art is subjective, and what fails to resonate with one may profoundly move another. Therefore, I encourage potential viewers to approach this production with an open mind but tempered expectations, prepared for an experience that is as bewildering as it is bold.

Matthew Bourne's Romeo and Juliet

2019

Musical

Matthew Bourne's Romeo and Juliet

2019

Musical

Plot summary

Director

Top cast

Tech specs

Movie Reviews

"Now, is the Winter of our discontent!"

A creative, different and imaginative view of a classic

A Bewildering Ballet: A Review of Matthew Bourne's Romeo and Juliet

4 Comments