My Father the Hero

1994

Action / Comedy / Romance

19
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 54% · 14 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 54% · 10K ratings
IMDb Rating 5.5/10 10 12196 12.2K

daughter holiday vacation family holiday caribbean sea

Plot summary

A teenage girl on vacation in the Bahamas with her divorced father tries to impress a potential boyfriend by saying that her father is actually her lover. Remake of the 1991 French film Mon père, ce héros.

Director

Steve Miner Photo
Steve Miner

Top cast

Faith Prince Photo
Faith Prince as Diana
Emma Thompson Photo
Emma Thompson as Isabel
Judy Clayton Photo
Judy Clayton as Ben's Mother
Lauren Hutton Photo
Lauren Hutton as Megan
720p.BluRay 1080p.BluRay
782.61 MB
1280*694
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
29.97 fps
1 hr 30 min
Seeds 5
1.45 GB
1920*1040
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
29.97 fps
1 hr 30 min
Seeds 21

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by Uriah43 6 / 10

Rescued from a Life of Crime and Drugs

All "Andre" (Gerard Depardieu) wants is to spend some quality time with his 14-year-old daughter "Nicole" (Katherine Heigl). So, he takes her to Jamaica for a nice vacation. However, when she gets there, she happens to fall in love with a young man named "Ben" (Dalton James) and, in order to impress him, says that she is actually 18--and that Andre is her lover who rescued her from a life of crime and drugs. One thing leads to another and soon the entire resort is under the impression that Andre is a child molester and treat his friendly gestures with complete disdain. Meanwhile, Nicole discovers that, in order to continue the ruse, she has to continue stretching the truth even more out-of-balance than ever before. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that, in spite of the risqué subject matter, this turned out to be a nice little comedy overall. I especially liked the scene where Andre is asked to play the piano and he chooses a song that infuriates the crowd. In any case, I enjoyed this movie and I have rated it accordingly. Slightly above average.
Reviewed by Brakathor 5 / 10

Proof That French Sensibilities Don't Translate Well To American Cinema. Shocking, Right?

Before I get into the actual merits of the film, it would be extremely remiss to not preface that with the real reason behind how and why this film came to be in the first place, a remake of a French film that was made only 3 years prior. For those of you who don't already know, Gerard Depardieu is basically a living legend in French cinema, so why not for American cinema too? Surely the whole world will love him just as much as the French do! In a mouthful, that's taking a lot for granted.Personally I never understood the mass appeal of this man in France. He's an A-list actor there, and while I don't begrudge him that, he's also become a bit of a phenomenon. In fact, you really don't have the American equivalent. To make it clearer, Americans really don't have ONE guy upon who's shoulder they can rest the entire history of American cinema. Gerard Depardieu is basically that guy in France. He's essentially to film what Elvis Presley was to music. This film was the film that was intended to launch Depardieu's acting debut in America, and make him a household name in America, so after being almost universally panned by critics, why didn't it work?Of all the screenplays they could have chosen for an American breakout feature, this one really was a curious choice. It's a film that deals with an incestuous, pedophilic subject. Europeans find this cute and funny, and the idea of older/younger relationships, as well as coming of age stories were a bit of a guilty pleasure over there for awhile, whereas those type of themes tend to creep out most Americans to the point where they would have trouble appreciating the comedy and irony in this type of film. That being said, even in Europe this type of pseudo-sex comedy was already on the way out by the mid 90s anyway. The "pseudo-sexual" aspect in and of itself is at the core of this film's lack of appeal to an American Audience. It's NOT really a sex comedy. It's PG rated with little to no sexual intrigue, so it's not going to appeal to young adults, and it's sure as hell not the type of thing most Americans would want to show to their kids.So how did the "Americanization" of this massive cultural disconnect go? Simply put, not well! For starters, French humour relies heavily on character comedy. As such, erratic mood swings and exaggerated reactions are common in French comedies. The end result is, Depardieu's acting comes across as forced; he overacts basically, and in combination with his thick accent and scripted English expressions that only a native English speaker would say, it comes across as extremely awkward and wooden. It's like trying to tell a joke in a foreign language when you barely understand the words coming out of your mouth. It's hard to distinguish when he's trying to be funny or when he's trying to be serious, and unlike actors like Michael Caine, he's bad at blending the two.One thing I find quite funny is how they tried to soften Depardieu's character in the American version to make him more likeable. For example, in the original, he beats his daughter twice, and he beats the woman he met at the resort once. All times in a matter of fact way as if not intended to illicit any type of audience reaction. Not so in the American Version. How's that for a cultural disconnect? In this version he comes across as more silly and light hearted, whereas in the original he comes across as a bit of a crank with a serious anger problem, and not likeable at all. There's definitely a "please like me!" aspect to this film which you'd probably only pick up on if you saw the original, but I definitely couldn't stop thinking about it, watching this.So how did this film compare to the original? Believe it or not, I still thought this film was slightly better than the original. Even though most of the scenes are essentially copy and pasted, this director staging the scenes more naturally and less forced. In the original, one plot premise is constantly feeding into another. He also quite sensibly cut out the violent altercation where Depardieu punches out the resort's cook, right before he undergoes his failed attempt to rescue his daughter. In the original he's whisked into an ambulance, and never gets charged for commiting assault, whereas in this film he's brought back to the guesthouse to sleep it off. Again, much more natural and less forced, this being the most extreme example of that.Ultimately though, neither are very good films. I suppose it didn't hurt that Katherine Heigl is much more attractive than the girl in the original film. Opposing that are things like the speedboat scene which in this film is more over-the-top than in the original, plus the entire premise itself comes across as forced, moreso in this film, especially when Depardieu's character spontaneously starts singing a song about little girls, completely oblivious to the fact that everyone at the resort thinks he's a pedophile. The scene that really kills it for me though in both films is the scene towards the end where the father is hiding in the bushes feeding lines to his daughter as she speaks to her male love interest in the film. So needlessly ridiculous.
Reviewed by scarlettwyrtzen 4 / 10

My Father the......WHAT?

Okay, so I first saw this movie when I was about 9. And I thought it was hilarious. But really, it is so wack. Very messed up but honestly, it's not horrible? The girl lies throughout the movie and it's about ...well, men? It's a good movie to watch when your scared to be alone and want to have something on to distract you or while your cooking something at night and feel scared.
Read more IMDb reviews

4 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment