Night Owl

1993

Crime / Drama / Horror

Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 80%
IMDb Rating 5.2/10 10 277 277

manhattan, new york city

Director

Jeffrey Arsenault Photo
Jeffrey Arsenault

Top cast

John Leguizamo Photo
John Leguizamo as Angel
Michael Musto Photo
Michael Musto as Club M.C.
David Roya Photo
David Roya as Dario
Yul Vazquez Photo
Yul Vazquez as Tomas

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by 6 / 10

Nice try

The movie is shot by Jeffrey Arsenault with an unblinking eye. It is a textbook case of how to produce and direct a guerrilla film -- it succeeds, but its biggest success is its perfect casting of John Leguizamo as Angel.
Reviewed by 5 / 10

Prententious Self Indulgent Bore

The Lower East Side scene in the 90's, that consisted of fake beat poets, musicians that usually couldn't play their instruments, and the junkies and barfly hangers on that thought they were among the most cutting edge scene since Andy Warhol's Factory, are the ones who created this pretentious film. Unlike the Warhol people, who earned attention from all over the world, the East Village scene existed, unnoticed by anyone outside of their group. But they didn't care, and "Night Owl" is a perfect example, It was a film that was made exclusively for those people, to impress them, and to include them in their project. it's a wasted opportunity, because "Night Owl" had potential. But to make it more commercial would have been a sellout. So instead of an erotic and atmospheric film, we get disgusting scenes of vomiting and of a vampire eating raw meat and licking the blood off the bottom of a refrigerator. And instead of atmosphere, we get poor lighting, rendering most of the images just too dark to see. The scenes of New York City are wasted, because so little of it can be seen in the 4x3 cropped picture frame. But at least the director made sure he included all his friends in his film, especially one "Screamin' Rachel," who gets WAY too much screen time, singing her lousy songs in the wretchedly lit bar, that could just as easily have been someones basement. Someone should have told her that she was appearing in a movie, and stopped her from staring into the camera (which isn't supposed to be there) for the entire time she is performing. The only good thing about this film, other than a few good camera angles, is John Leguizamo, who is sadly underused in this student film. If only someone with real knowledge of film making could have been involved to stop the director from making bad choices, "Night Owl" could have been a true cult gem in the tradition of "Martin," or "Fade To Black." Instead it is merely a curiosity piece to those interested in the NYC underground scene that was going on before the city was reduced to the generic, outdoor shopping center it is today. Sadly, NONE of this artistic edginess exists there today, and most of the people in this film are long gone...with the exception of Leguizamo, who went on to a successful career. The incredible Bluray label "Vinegar Syndrome" has given this thing the restoration treatment, but because the movie is so poorly made...it still looks lousy. There are so many great films that are lost. and deserve to be restored; "Night Owl" was an odd choice for them.
Reviewed by 6 / 10

VERY low budget and not good--but there's something about it I like

Movie shot in b&w and takes place in NYC in 1984 (for no reason I could see). Jake (James Raftery) is 19. He's handsome and popular but there's one problem--he's a vampire (none of his friends know). One night he brings home Zohra (Karen Wexler) and, after some rough sex, drinks her blood. He stuffs her body in a trash bag and throws it away. Her hot-headed brother Angel (John Leguizamo) is looking for her and won't give up. Also Jake falls in love with Anne (Ali Thomas)--but can he control his blood lust? I'm going to be nice to this movie. It was made on an ultra low budget and though it doesn't succeed it has plenty of moments. First--the bad. I found the soundtrack VERY loud and obnoxious. It's punk rock and I don't like it. The script is kind of hard to follow and a lot of things just don't make sense. Also there's no real ending. The movie just sort of stops. But--I still like it in some strange way. For one thing the acting is good. Raftery is handsome and intense in the lead role. He expertly portrays his character's anguish at having to drink people's blood and his struggle to suppress it. Also he has multiple nude scenes and does have a nice body. Leguizamo is also good (if a little TOO hot-headed) as Angel. Actually no one is really bad. Also there's some nice directorial touches from director Jeffrey Arsenault. I LOVE one scene where all you see is Jake's eyes as he's watching Anne. Also there's an interview with the fabulous Caroline Munro about vampires. It's in b&w but on the DVD they have the full interview in color. So--this is far from perfect but I really like something about it. It was a labor of love for the director and it shows. I give it a 6.
Read more IMDb reviews

No comments yet

Be the first to leave a comment