Oh, Canada

2024

Drama

vietnam war infidelity regret husband wife relationship based on novel or book montreal, canada

Director

Paul Schrader Photo
Paul Schrader

Top cast

Jacob Elordi Photo
Jacob Elordi as Young Leo Fife
Uma Thurman Photo
Uma Thurman as Emma / Gloria
Richard Gere Photo
Richard Gere as Leo Fife
Penelope Mitchell Photo
Penelope Mitchell as Sloan Ambrose / Amy
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU 720p.WEB 1080p.WEB 1080p.WEB.x265
871 MB
1280*536
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 34 min
Seeds 4
1.75 GB
1920*804
English 5.1
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 34 min
Seeds 9
869.03 MB
1280*536
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 34 min
Seeds 10
1.74 GB
1920*804
English 5.1
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 34 min
Seeds 16
1.58 GB
1920*804
English 5.1
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 34 min
Seeds 6

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by boblipton 5 / 10

A Messy Life, A Messy Film

Richard Gere is a respected maker of hard-hitting, muckraking documentary films. He works with his wife and producer, Uma Thurman. Many years ago he fled from the United States in protest over the Viet Nam War. Now it is 2023, he is dying, and several students of his are making a documentary, interviewing him over the protests and under the watchful eye of his producer and wife, Uma Thurman.Schrader is a careful writer, and there are several ways to interpret this movie. Certain critics have called it "autobiographical" because they are so intellectually lazy that they can't be bothered to think more than one thought before they give up. There may be autobiographical points to this movie. Certainly the movie reflect Schraeder's opinions, rather, than say, a panda bear's, or those of a large lump of rock scraped down from the Laurentian Shield into the terminal morrain of Long Island. That, I believe, doesn't make it autobiographical, nor does the fact that the guy is a film maker. There are film makers and film makers. Even though Gere and the folks making the film-within-the-film want to make a sensational film no matter what the cost, Miss Thurman's only wish is to protect her husband, even though she already knows the worst.I did consider whether this was a meditation on film making itself. It certainly has aspects of that. A film maker will shoot many more feet of film than he winds up needing, and edits it into a final form that may or may not bear any relationship to reality or the film maker's original intentions. As Gere dies on camera and over the course of the movie, the events of his life that he wishes to tell come up confused and mishappen, conflating and confabulating with each other. To make sense of that, to make a movie of that -- for the guys within the film already have a contract to sell the film -- will require an editor. That is the true work of any story teller: to arrange events and characters within a story, so that it makes sense to the audience.But more central to understanding this film is to see that, like others in Schraeder's body of work, it is primarily concerned with outrage. In some ways his work resembles that of Ingmar Bergman: raised religiously, he pondered human fallibility in a world with no G*d to lend an objective framework of right and wrong: puzzlement and disappointment, leaving the audience the question of how to work out a system of morality. Schraeder, on the other hand, seems outraged, filled with despair, and leaving the mess to be cleaned up by the unfortunate survivors. Gere leaves the film makers to make sense of his interview, and Miss Thurman to clean up the mess and lies he has made of his life. It's not Gere's problem: he's dead. And it's not Schraeder's.Anyway, those are a couple of the ways of viewing the film that I came up with. If you see the movie, despite the fact there's not an explosion or a good joke on view, let me know if they make sense to you. And if you have any interpretations that are different, too.
Reviewed by ksf-2 6 / 10

confusing but interesting

Jack elordi is the young leo fife, while richard gere is the older, grown up film maker. He's telling his story towards the end of his life, but it's very complicated. He admits to making mistakes, but he says he will tell the truth. Flashback to fife as a young man. So many decisions to be made. Going to war. Running a company. Leaving. Always leaving. But some of the stories get so strange, it's not clear what's true and what is just being mis-remembered. Maybe the lies about all the lies is the real story. And the fact that fife has cancer. He's quickly getting confused and feeble, and angry. It's interesting. And mostly good. The jumping forward and backward sometimes gets confusing. The amount of uncertainty and confusion will annoy some people. Many things are left to the viewer to resolve. Directed by paul schrader. Was nominated for first reformed. Story by russell banks.
Reviewed by grahamchris 5 / 10

In The Middle

Perusing the reviews already on here regarding this movie. I notice there are a wide range of scores and views. Some giving it 8 or higher pronouncing it a work of genius. Where as others are giving it a 3 or less. Claiming it a bunch of pretentious rubbish.Where do I stand? Hmm. I've just watched it and I am still digesting. It is possibly a movie to be watched several times to get the true meaning. Although I must admit there is no way I would sit through this film again. I'm pleased I have seen it but it certainly will not be going in my bag of films to watch again.I'm going down the middle with a 5. That's possibly being too kind.
Read more IMDb reviews

17 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment