Syndromes and a Century

2006 [THAI]

Drama

3
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Certified Fresh 89% · 44 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 77% · 10K ratings
IMDb Rating 7.3/10 10 4891 4.9K

buddhism lovers hospital

Director

Apichatpong Weerasethakul Photo
Apichatpong Weerasethakul

Top cast

Jenjira Pongpas Photo
Jenjira Pongpas as Pa Jane
Norathep Panyanavakij Photo
Norathep Panyanavakij as Temple boy with old monk
Rangsan Sutthimaneenun Photo
Rangsan Sutthimaneenun as Hospital director
Apirak Mitrpracha Photo
Apirak Mitrpracha as Dr. Neng, Off's therapist
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
973.87 MB
1280*722
Thai 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 45 min
Seeds 3
1.95 GB
1910*1078
Thai 5.1
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 45 min
Seeds 9

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by grantft 8 / 10

A film about the way that memory feels.

Here there is no story, no beginning or end. Snippets only of the universal experience of memory and feeling. So banal, so beautiful, the camera looks - often from a distance almost in reverie, at the smallest things in our lives. The camera is in fact a detached "third eye" - seeing what we don't focus on, remembering what we have forgotten. The actors (are they actors?) play out their small parts with humor, grace and and sincere naturalism.One of a handful of directors using the unique language of film to its fullest doing what no other medium can do. Touching, funny, hypnotic, complex and simple - Weerasethakul's signature is all over this film - his humanity, his recognition that the unexplainable is present in every ordinary life, that everything is worthy of our attention ...
Reviewed by Chris Knipp 8 / 10

Mysteries of reminiscence

Reviewed by bobt145 7 / 10

Symmetry, Support and Sainthood

If only this dream sequence of a film came with a frame, a few moments of lucid guidance. A narrator, even for a brief opening and perhaps an explanatory note on the shift from rural Thailand to urban?Without a background prep course, we are left wandering. We are told by reviewers that this is a film about "Joe's" parents, his memories. Oh? Where? Not in the film. Not unless some lengthy Thai passage wasn't translated.Please, Apichatpong, just a hint and the help of structure. It wouldn't have harmed the feel, the mood, the effect, in any way.Are the two contrasting sections of the film, rural to urban, concurrent or a gap in time?Some scenes, disassociated as they may be, are marvelous. The industrial process room, with a snakelike suction tube that would have done Dali proud. The steam, the fumes, whatever the smoky substance, swirling amid the machinery, I could smell the metal in the air.We are also told by other reviewers that it's one of the Four Best films of the past decade in one poll and THE best in a poll of critics associated with the prestigious Toronto Film Festival.Really? You can't be serious.What it truly is? A film of beauty, of quiet, of sly humor, reflection, and a soundtrack of subdued accompaniment that seems to invite introspection in the viewer.That's not all that bad, if you ask me. But we need a Sherpa beyond the simple edits.If you do some research you'll find that the film was prohibited from exhibition in Thailand. Four scenes the censors thought objectionable, including a long, yet somewhat passive kiss and the sight of a monk playing guitar.Strange, these moral critiques coming from country that for decades allowed its capital to become the brothel of the world.I fear some of the reviews are thus political. And certainly I can't support censorship. But let's get a grip on the difference between support for the filmmaker and sainthood.
Read more IMDb reviews

No comments yet

Be the first to leave a comment