The Sound and the Fury

1959

Action / Drama

8
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 60% · 5 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 44%
IMDb Rating 6.2/10 10 1098 1.1K

Director

Top cast

William Challee as Roustabout
Margaret Leighton as Caddy Compson
Stuart Whitman as Charlie Busch
Sam Gilman as Bus Driver
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
815.80 MB
1280*720
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 50 min
Seeds 1
1.84 GB
1920*1080
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 50 min
Seeds 2

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by MOscarbradley 6 / 10

This needs to be even trashier than it is.

A great source novel, a fine director, a terrific cast and two very good writers so what could possibly have gone wrong? Something obviously did for at best Martin Ritt's film of William Faulkner's "The Sound and the Fury" never rises above camp which is fine by me just so long as you don't expect anything more than a trashy piece of Southern Gothic.This was a Jerry Wald production and was aimed at an adult audience or maybe just an adult American audience who took these shenanigans for granted, (its Deep South setting has always been a source of fascination). It's a family saga, (naturally), and set on some kind of plantation, (naturally), though perhaps the most interesting aspect is that the black servants are much more forward thinking than their white employers.A miscast Yul Brynner, (with wig), is the head of the household; Joanne Woodward, (too old for the part she is playing), is the rebelious young girl whose mother, (Margaret Leighton), abandoned her as a baby but who has now returned to the fold; Ethel Waters is the 'Mammy' character, Jack Warden is the 'idiot' uncle, Francoise Rosay is Brynner's mother and Stuart Whitman, the carny with an eye on Woodward. With such a disparate cast you could say they are a very strange family. On the plus side it certainly looks good; Charles G Clarke shot it in Cinemascope and it is certainly lush. It might have been better if it had been even trashier; as it is it's somewhat po-faced. If you must have Faulkner go with "The Tarnished Angels" or even "The Long Hot Summer".
Reviewed by

Reviewed by mark.waltz 2 / 10

The fury comes as a result of the sounds from the screen.

A talented cast is pretty much miscast in this saga allegedly loosely based on William Faulkner novel, a follow-up for director Martin Ritt and Joanne Woodward from the previous year's "The Long Hot Summer". That saga of southern decadence is a classic in comparison to this film, and it shows that when Hollywood goes overboard on a theme, a lot of times they fall on their face. While most of the adaptions of Tennessee Williams plays did very well, other authors were not as lucky. I know nothing about the William Faulkner novel so I can only judge by the film itself which is a confusing soap opera of troubled characters who serve no real purpose other than to see everybody else around them with their messed up brains.

The trouble begins with family matriarch Françoise Rosay, a hateful old woman who seems to be two different characters as far as moods and motivations. Her three faces are not like Eve's, and it seems that she lives to make everybody around her miserable. Sons Yul Brynnur (looking silly in an orange wig), Jack Warden and John Beal are equally messed up, adopted granddaughter Joanne Woodward is on the road to becoming a tramp, and the sudden return of her once beautiful but trashy mother Margaret Leighton is the yeast in this cake filled with sour ingredients.

Everything is there to make for a fascinating look at a troubled family, and it does become engrossing, if often ridiculous, starting with the miscasting of Brynnur and Woodward. Yul is fine in his acting, but he does not appear to be at all related to this family, and Woodward is obviously a good decade too old for her part. At first glance, she does look young, and I tried to suspend disbelief thinking of Julie Harris in "A Member of the Wedding", but when the camera finally does come close to her, it is obvious that she is far too old to be cast in this part, unless her character's life has been so hard that it staged her a decade even in her teens.

Every southern saga has to seem to have some sort of drifter character, and in this case, it's Stuart Whitman who shows up and begins to flirt with Woodward. It's obvious that this relationship will lead to no good, especially considering the dramatic music that plays in the background when he frantically runs through her estate trying to find her.

Other than Leighton, the only real touch of class in this film is a presence of Ethel Waters as a longtime servant, having issues with her own family which includes a young grandson who has been assigned to be a companion to the Warden. A disturbing scene has Warden being taken into a town festival as part of a supposed freak show and another scene where two young kids get together to dare each other to throw a rock at him. This film is best watched with the mentality that it will be like a trashy novel rather than the American classic that Faulkner had written 30 years before.

Read more IMDb reviews

1 Comment

Be the first to leave a comment