Urban Legends: Final Cut (2000) YIFY - Download Movie TORRENT

Reviewed by hellholehorror 4 / 10

Not the worst

I hate films that have extended sections of a fictional film in the real film pretending they are fake films but only reveal it's a fake film after what appears to be one take although in reality it would have been lots of takes if that makes sense. I mean if a film student made the film in the opening with all that cast and crew and production quality then they are not a film student they are an expert. Anyway, whatever, the fun opening was ruined by a poor concept. The film is well made but silly in an entertaining way. I hate films about film students. Conceptually I hated this film, it's not really about urban legends at all. It reminded me of Peeping Tom (1960) but with higher production value and less interesting. The cast is so generic. There's a silly moment when someone hears something through a microphone but it's nowhere near them, you can't hear someone on a boom mic through a few walls. The locations are cool and it has some really good set pieces and I actually liked the ending. Not the worst sequel but also not very good, slightly below average.

Reviewed by jasonw-5 5 / 10

Too many scary filmmakers making scary movies that make fun of scary movies.

As a former film student the setting for the film had some appeal. Film students after the coveted Hitchcock Award strive to make the film that will secure them a spot in Hollywood, just like the honored alumni before them. Unfortunately the power of greed has someone taking out the competition.It begins with an obvious film-within-a-film cliché to introduce us to all the principal characters/victims of the film. The cast, a slew of nobodies, lacks any true depth and continually stumbles through forced 21st dialogue. The only recognizable face, Joey Lawrence of Blossom fame, has matured in looks but not so much in talent. In fact, the most entertaining parts of the film are when the killer `urbanizes' his victims making the viewer happy to see them go.The entire story is weak and too many standard horror movie conventions are tossed into the mix. Bumps in the dark, shadows in the background and masked characters that appear out of nowhere are tired repeats of films in our past. As expected, every character is given a reason to be the killer until the very next scene when they are exonerated because another character seems more deserving.With many veiled references to Alfred Hitchcock's films, the filmmakers may have thought they were honoring the great director but in reality the idea is so poorly done that they only come across as cheap rip-offs. Stair climbing in a tower ala Vertigo and a weak wheelchair scene ala Rear Window are two that come to mind.The whole scary movie genre was given life by Scream and now it ought to be put out of its misery with one swift swing of the ax.2 1/2 out of 5

Reviewed by MissCzarChasm 5 / 10

On the Same Level as the Orginal

Urban Legends: Final Cut starts off on the right note just like the original. It doesn't have horror classic written all over it like the first one did when it began but it still starts off above average. However just like the orignal once the film begins to progress it slowly turns into another crappy slasher film.The premise uses the whole movie within a movie tie in that is quite frankly getting a bit tired. Our new heroine is trying to win the prestigious Hitchcock Award for her new film which is about a serial killer who kills his victims based on Urban Legends. however once murders begin to happen on the set it becomes much harder to seperate fact from fiction.What i Liked:The heroine in this film is far more engaging than the one from the first film. She gives an honest performance and despite a tepid script she holds her own.Very interesting to see Joey...no i mean Joseph Lawrence in this film. I joked about him being in it when i first heard about it but he was actually kinda good. In fact i wish he could've been in it more because he provides some pretty funny moments in the film.i liked how it wasn't just a slasher film. During certain moments it played like a thriller and for at least the majority of the film the whodunit aspect is quite engaging.i liked the use of seperating fact from fiction. That was a bit interesting. The scene where thry begin to watch Amy's reel and the killer switches it to the death he filmed was pretty intense.What i didn't Like:Where in the hell were the urban legend deaths. We got one and that was it. The one they has was pretty good but the film is called urban legend you would tihnk they would utilize that.The last half of the film is even more ludicrious than the one in the first film. i found my self dumbfounded that they actually were allowed to produce the last half of this film. what a disappointed.You can tell that we're running out of costumes for the killer to wear. The fencing mask and black apparel might seem frightening to some but all i kept thinking was the killer looks like a giant micro-phone.The acting, with the exception of two people, is so painfully bad. My two year old brother could even act circles around these people.This might not say much but at least this sequelis better than something like I Still Know What you did Last Summer. It barely sinks below the level of the original and i guess that says something. It's no film masterpiece but i tihnk fans of the first film may enjoy it.5/10

Urban Legends: Final Cut

2000

Action / Horror / Mystery / Thriller

Urban Legends: Final Cut

2000

Action / Horror / Mystery / Thriller

Plot summary

Director

Top cast

Tech specs

Movie Reviews

Not the worst

Too many scary filmmakers making scary movies that make fun of scary movies.

On the Same Level as the Orginal

2 Comments