Welcome to Hell

2018

Action / Horror

12
IMDb Rating 2.9/10 10 261 261

Plot summary

A terrifying coven of tales designed to take viewers into the nether reaches of insanity, shock and horror.

720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
787.16 MB
1280*714
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 33 min
Seeds 1
1.48 GB
1920*1072
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 33 min
Seeds ...

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by MasterD-7 3 / 10

Welcome to Dull

There really is a reason why I hate anthology films. Everything with this film gets connected in such a messy way and it's bad. This looks and feels bad and so many directors coming together to do a segment is great and all, and different but these films don't work and never will. Please do things more refreshing.
Reviewed by Manuel-Hoerth 1 / 10

Is this supposed to be a joke?

This is a joke, right? And they where thinking: "How can we make the worst movie ever?".Because actually, if they were going for that and were trying to make another one those "It's so bad it's good" movies (like "Birdemic" for example) they actually did a "good" job!Because as a horror movie it's laughable and even most "Trash" movies are better productions than whatever this is supposed to be. But as a complete train wreck, it's actually pretty "good" and I really don't mean that in any mean way, but I mean it as a genuine complement! And as such it's actually entertaining and definitely more entertaining than movies like Sharknado that try hard (and ultimately fail) to be "so bad it's good". This movie doesn't even need to try, it comes natural and I have to admit it kept me entertained the entire time. It's like a good old fashioned murder mystery and it really keeps you at the edge of your seat. Only instead of trying to figure out who the murderer is, you are constantly trying to figure out if they were really trying to make the first truly worthy sequel to "The Room" (in which case they kinda succeeded) or if they were genuinely trying to make a "real" movie (in which case they kinda failed).For example: Are they intentionally shooting scenes without any light to make the movie bad, or do they genuinely not know that you need light for a shoot? And do they have good and bright light in the next scene to make it intentionally inconsistent, or because they realized their mistake and are genuinely trying to improve? Are they shooting out of focus to the point were you think they must be putting Vaseline on the lens, to make the film intentionally bad or to make the film appear artsy? And again, do they use various inconsistent (but equally bad) consumer cameras from 20 years ago to make the film intentionally bad or because they think that would make the movie appear "retro"? You just never ever know and so it's an endless mystery that is actually sort of fun.With Birdemic and Sharknado, you know they were intentionally trying to be "so bad it's good", in which case it doesn't really work. But with this movie, you really can't tell, so they actually succeed at being "so bad it's good". So now I don't really know what to rate it, cause it really is so bad that it becomes so entertaining that I feel it would actually deserve a higher rating, but I feel that by giving it a good rating I would actually hurt the film more than by giving it a bad rating (and it truly is a bad film after all). But as a "so bad it's good" movie, I would actually give it a 10!Also, I think I figured out why they called it "Welcome to Hell". It's because that's the only movie available on the streaming service down there...
Read more IMDb reviews

6 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment