Wyatt Earp's Revenge

2012

Action / Drama / Western

3
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 21% · 1 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 21% · 100 ratings
IMDb Rating 4.5/10 10 2034 2K

Plot summary

Wyatt Earp is approached by a journalist for an interview about how he became a famous sheriff. Earp told the story of how he was a fearless U.S. Marshall. If 27-year old Wyatt Earp comes out that his first girlfriend Dora Hand was murdered. Together with his friend Doc Holliday, Bat Masterson, Bill Tilghman and Charlie Bassett he goes hunting for the perpetrator ...

Director

Michael Feifer Photo
Michael Feifer

Top cast

Shawn Roberts Photo
Shawn Roberts as Wyatt Earp - 1878
Val Kilmer Photo
Val Kilmer as Wyatt Earp - 1907
Andrew Hawkes Photo
Andrew Hawkes as Livery Man
Caia Coley Photo
Caia Coley as Mrs. Kenedy
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
851.07 MB
1280*714
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 32 min
Seeds ...
1.71 GB
1920*1072
English 5.1
NR
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 32 min
Seeds 3

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by Wizard-8

Worn out western

I first learned of this movie when finding a DVD copy of it in my local Wal-Mart's $5 DVD bin. Now, I love westerns, and I was tempted to buy it since it was a western and cheap. But then I remembered that Val Kilmer in recent years has said yes to numerous junky projects. So I ultimately decided not to buy it. But today I watched it after it appeared on a movie TV channel, and boy, am I glad I didn't buy it all those months ago. To begin with, the movie is a cheat. Though Val Kilmer's name is trumpeted, in fact he only has about seven to ten minutes of footage in the entire movie. Which is just as well, because the combination of his uninspired acting plus his strangely puffy face doesn't exactly make him interesting to observe. Actually, the rest of the cast is pretty awful as well. They give "modern" performances despite the bulk of the movie taking place in the 1800s, and none of their characters come across in a compelling way. The surroundings are shabby as well - there's not that much action, with the movie mostly being conversations, none of which sounds very interesting. And the movie looks real cheap, from the unconvincing sets to unspectacular countryside. Whether you are a Kilmer fan and/or a western fan, more likely than not you'll find this movie to be really poor and not worth any attention.
Reviewed by TMoney46 3 / 10

Spend your time elsewhere

For very good reason, copies of this on DVD are selling for around A$2 on eBay. The parts of Val Kilmer retelling the story weren't too bad - it was the parts that showed the story that were just awful. It didn't flow at all and jumped around too much to be able to relate to any of it. There's no other way to describe the acting than shocking. I've seen better acting at school plays than was on show here. I'd love to know how much these people were being paid for their roles. If it's anything significant then I'm downing tools and becoming an actor because while I may not be better than this lot (Kilmer excluded), I couldn't be worse.The actual premise of the story in itself isn't a bad one and having done some research on it is quite an interesting tale. The way it's portrayed in Wyatt Earp's Revenge is just terrible. I wouldn't have been surprised if Rob Schneider popped in for a cameo it was that cringe worthy.Kilmer was good, the rest not even worth bothering with.
Read more IMDb reviews

1 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment