Can I Get a Witness

2024

Sci-Fi

3
IMDb Rating 5.4/10 10 305 305

wistful bitter audacious cheerful foreboding

Director

Ann Marie Fleming Photo
Ann Marie Fleming

Top cast

Patrick Gallagher Photo
Patrick Gallagher as Sam
Jovanna Huguet Photo
Jovanna Huguet as Nancy
Keira Jang Photo
Keira Jang as Kiah
Yuki Morita Photo
Yuki Morita as Anna
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
1018.11 MB
1280*534
English 2.0
NR
us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 50 min
Seeds 3
2.04 GB
1920*800
English 5.1
NR
us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 50 min
Seeds 7

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by steiner-sam 6 / 10

I'm not sure it finally found a solid message

It's a post-apocalyptic drama set in British Columbia over several days in about 2040 after a 2025 worldwide disaster. The apocalypse left the world in a non-digital, marginal electricity-powered society with exceptionally restricted travel. However, there is food for all, minimal conflict, and strict limitations on natural resource usage. There is also a limit to the length of life. Ellie (Sandra Oh) is the mother of Kiah (Keira Jang). Ellie remembers "before" the apocalypse; Kiah is starting her role as an "end of life" witness. Her more experienced co-worker is Daniel (Joel Oulette). The film follows their activities over several days as they visit clients."Can I Get a Witness?" describes itself as a fable and uses some reasonably pointless animation to underscore that concept. The story is creative and takes some decent swings at several examples of responses to the reformed society's requirements. The cinematography that emphasizes nature makes the film almost a satire, but it's not that either. I'm not sure it finally found a solid message to deliver.
Reviewed by Oreopan 6 / 10

Great idea without the oomph

This movie explores the theme of planet sustainability - if all humans are suddenly required by law to stop their life at 50, and stop using all electronics, then Earth can restore its resources and future generations can live without hunger, war, etc. The two main characters in the movie are the witnesses who go to people aged 50 at designated times to witness this agreement being fulfilled. I'll talk about the drawbacks of this movie first, and then mention a couple things I thought it did well.The idea is interesting, and it starts off with some light world-building. It eases you into the concept gently. Bit by bit you learn what happens. I was really curious to see where it goes and what other themes in this concept it explores.Unfortunately, it very quickly fell flat for me. Despite introducing a great idea, and the roles of the two people, it didn't dive deep into anything within it at all. It barely covered the basic things an average viewer would wonder when being introduced to such an idea. The concept stayed surface-level the whole time. There were no complications or intricacies with what this would mean, no drawbacks (aside from maybe one), just the immediate idea itself, and everything felt scripted and inorganic.What's more, there was more 'telling' than 'showing'. The concept was reiterated verbally throughout the movie, and it got a bit tedious to constantly listen to the reasoning: 'it's for our planet!'. After a while, it felt more like a movie for hippies, rather than for the general public who could benefit from being encouraged to reflect on the state of our planet. I would have loved to get visual examples of how certain things could have gone wrong, or what they were alluding to when they kept saying 'it's for the planet'. It just wasn't clear. When I finished the movie, it didn't leave me with anything to really ponder, and neither did I feel like I learned anything.The acting, unfortunately, wasn't good. I felt like I was watching a high school drama recital. And this is where the director should have been stricter on the directing part - sure, it's likely frustrating to work with someone who insists on 17 takes per shot, but the end result is usually so seamless, that people forget they're watching a movie. Here, I was constantly reminded that I'm watching some actors reciting the lines that they've recently rehearsed. The only person who really pulled through and looked and sounded natural was Sandra Oh, and she's a seasoned actress. Hopefully, the director feels more comfortable in her directing role in the future and really works with the actor for each scene until they manage to bring their lines to life.The visuals were stunning! I'm not sure they fit the theme, because they felt a bit misplaced at times, but it was a unique touch that gave the movie some character.The sounds was beautiful. There were a few breathtaking scenes with, ironically, the stillness of sound. It was suddenly so silent, that the whole cinema held their breath and just watched as everything stood still. Then once the sound returned, everyone went back to breathing normally. It was great.All in all, the movie pulls a 6 because of its beautiful sound design, use of light with hopeful tones, and fairly new concept that I haven't seen often in movies. Though it would have been higher if the other points I mentioned can be improved, I was happy to have watched it.
Reviewed by js-66130 6 / 10

HIPPIE-FI

Imagine back in the summer of love, if the tree loving hippies got their protesting ways and the world decided to eschew economical greed in order to save mother earth. No one is tethered to their phones, folks get around on bicycles, nature is blooming everywhere one looks, oh, and you can only live to fifty. So there's that.Look, we all know euthanasia is the cure for all our ills, just say oh yeah to the Kool Aid."Can I Get a Witness" imagines this not so distant future, in a seemingly idyllic society, where people talk, hang out, draw, and die. They also draw the dying. That's just one of the quirks permeating this movie: youngsters are conscripted to sketch the final moments of volunteer deathers. It is a odd production, involving the presentation of a very untechnical wooden box that, when opened, wafts a purple gas a la the campy Batman television series. Except this is all serious. Everyone is serious. Way too serious. If the future is this unfun, then why bother? Seems like a lot of sacrifice for green boredom.The calamity that lead to this rash point in history is never fully explained, nor the fact that everyone seems on board with the program. Bet there would be some uppity 49 year olds with other radical ideas.Some big topics are tackled here - the persevering goodness of humanity, the wonder of personal connection, the meaning of life, the youth of youth, the preservation of natural resources, the guilty pleasure of a refrigerator - but it feels a little too flighty to get worked up about (the added animation doesn't help). And to get to this stage of climate calming, people have to really get worked up.Nice try though.hipCRANK.
Read more IMDb reviews

4 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment